Safe or Interesting?
Just read a great article by A.O. Scott, who reviews films for the “New York Times.” His article discusses the appropriateness of movies for children, and why he chooses to take his kids to see PG-13 and even R rated movies when he believes his kids will benefit.
“Just-right” is often boring and frustrating
His arguments apply equally well to filmmaking, I think. Anyone making films who wants to engage viewers might take note.
- “Just-right” is often boring and frustrating
- PG-13 is sometimes an attempt by the movie industry to protect itself. Doesn’t always mean the film isn’t suitable for children (or for those who select their films by the ratings)
- Apprehension and uncertainty are sometimes more fun than predictable
- Exploring history can be fun when it’s wrapped around stories about things like childhood friendships (The Kite Runner) or sports teams (The Great Debaters)
Read his article for a more in-depth discussion on a great topic.
I think the rating system can be used as a general guideline, but it is also ridiculous. I would rather teens see The Patriot or Gladiator than any of a host of PG-13 films. Not to mention The Passion of the Christ.
January 17th, 2008 at 8:53 pm