<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family-Friendly &#8220;Ugly Betty&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://christianmovienews.com/family-friendly-ugly-betty/</link>
	<description>An ongoing dialogue about faith and film.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://christianmovienews.com/family-friendly-ugly-betty/#comment-3573</link>
		<author>David Mackey</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christianmovienews.com/family-friendly-ugly-betty/#comment-3573</guid>
		<description>What confuses me is how the MPAA decides ratings on previews. Have you noticed that previews that contain more inappropriate materal for "general audiences" than some PG-13 films are still considered "appropriate for all audiences." Sometimes I have been blistered by inappropriate content in the previews before a movie, while the movie itself was fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What confuses me is how the MPAA decides ratings on previews. Have you noticed that previews that contain more inappropriate materal for &#8220;general audiences&#8221; than some PG-13 films are still considered &#8220;appropriate for all audiences.&#8221; Sometimes I have been blistered by inappropriate content in the previews before a movie, while the movie itself was fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
