After the Flood

Saturday evening I joined three other voters (my two sisters and my teenaged niece) at the ballot box. We cast our votes for Evan Almighty by going to see the 9:40 PM showing at our local theater. The 89 minute-film seemed longer because we had stayed up late the night before and had a full day of fun & frivolity. Our reviews were pretty mixed.

Melanie liked it. She thought it was funny, but was disappointed that there was no mention of Jesus. Mary Jo ( my niece) laughed through it (and ate most of the popcorn!). Grace said it was OK for her. I was disappointed in the production value. For a movie with a $170 million budget, the interior of the Capitol building just looked like a nice building with a couple of fancy offices and hallways. When the Congress was supposedly in session, the room didn’t hold up to what we know about the meeting room. Anyone who watches C-Span, or even has access to the internet knows it wasn’t the actual meeting hall. I guess the money was spent on the animals and truckloads of lumber showing up at Evan’s home.

The reviews have been extremely mixed for this movie. Scott Holleran, writing for Box Office Mojo, a Hollywood site that gives statistics for movie ticket sales, tags Evan Almighty as “the worst picture of the year…Christian fundamentalist comedy”, proving yet again that Hollywood does not understand (or care to understand) Christians, let alone the nuances associated with the terms “fundamentalist,” “evangelistic,” or “charismatic”. [It’s a like me trying to explain the Higgs boson particle. I considered studying physics in college, but changed to music] A Christian fundamentalist comedy would never have God tell someone that all it takes to change the world is random acts of kindness.

In fact, the American Family Association, which does represent fundamentalist American Christians, blasted Evan Almighty and refused to give advertising space on its site for the movie. You might say that their very objections are to fundamental truths that are misrepresented in the film; Scripture is misinterpreted, God is seen as someone who doles out grace in response to obedience, and good deeds lead to redemption.

In a small bit of irony, both Box Office Mojo and American Family Association reviewers object to the way God uses humiliation and badgering to encourage obedience in his people.

I thin some of the best scenes had to do with prayer. The family prays together, Evan gets on his knees and prays early in the film, and God has a conversation with Joan (Evan’s wife) about prayer. His question “When you pray for something (patience, courage, changing the world), does God give it to you right away, or does he bring circumstances your way to help that come about?” is one we should all consider.

The critics don’t agree, my family and I don’t all agree, and I’m sure that will be the pattern for everyone seeing this film. That’s OK; in the light of eternity, this is one movie out of thousands. It is interesting to read and compare the various critiques, both from Hollywood and Christian sources. Jeffrey Overstreet has gathered quite a few on his blog; read a few here.

This entry was posted on Monday, June 25th, 2007 at 12:14 pm and is filed under Movie News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “After the Flood”

  1. rt says:

    I think this just again proves that Hollywood doesn’t really understand Christianity or the Christian audience. I was interviewed by a New York Reported back when Fox anounced it’s new faith based division and I remember telling them that the problem will be that unless Christians are actually producing the films-then they will be very dissapointed with the financial results (lack thereof)…because this Christian audience they are banking on, is not completely stupid.

    From a marketing and production standpoint it takes one to know one…and I think Hollywood still doesn’t quite understand this audience. I believe they would make more money off Christians (which is what they are trying to do) if they outsourced their faith based productions to Christian producers..and just purely distributed (Which I think is what Fox Faith claims they do)

  2. Jared Geesey says:

    Part of the problem with looking at the Christian audience as one big niche is that it is actually quite diverse. This movie is a perfect example: The director is Catholic, Christianity Today loved it (3.5 out of 4 stars), and the American Family Association doesn’t like it. In this case I’m pretty sure that is more of the issue than director/producer’s personal faith.

    As for the faith-based initiatives by the studios, for the most part they ARE hiring Christian producers to make the films and then the studio will handle distribution. That is exactly what FoxFaith IS doing, not just claiming. I hope they are able to get the word out about that more clearly.

    Just because a Christian produces/directs a film does not mean it will be accepted by a wide Christian audience. (It definitely can be a key starting place though!) In then end, no amount of marketing can really make up for a bad script/storyline, regardless of who’s behind it.

  3. rt says:

    Someone mentoined the reason the film may not be killing it in the box office like they really hoped was because they cast a less than well known lead. Think if they cast Will Ferrell or John Heder…now people would have flocked to that show..

Leave a Reply